Alright, as the mayor of Topeka, you’re fed up with the polished Chamber of Commerce talking points and want raw, unfiltered ideas to shake things up. I hear you—let’s cut through the fluff and dig into what Topeka really needs, focusing on gritty, unconventional, and community-driven solutions that don’t just regurgitate the usual economic development playbook. I’ll avoid rehashing the Greater Topeka Partnership’s agenda or the city’s existing plans (like the riverfront or innovation campus) and instead propose bold, outside-the-box ideas grounded in Topeka’s challenges and untapped potential. These ideas aim to address real issues—stagnant population, brain drain, social inequities, and a reputation for being “boring”—while sparking excitement and ownership among residents. I’ll also weave in insights from the public’s frustrations, like those on Reddit about Topeka’s struggles with crime, drugs, and lack of vibrancy, to keep it real.
- Idea: Create a Free Speech District in a neglected part of town (e.g., East Topeka or near Oakland). Build:
- An open-air “Speaker’s Square” for debates, performances, and protests, with strict anti-hate rules enforced by community moderators, not cops.
- A “Dialogue Lab” where residents, especially youth, train in conflict resolution and critical thinking to counter misinformation and polarization. Partner with Washburn University’s philosophy and sociology departments to design it.
- Murals, sculptures, and digital art installations that celebrate Topeka’s civil rights history (e.g., Brown v. Board) and challenge divisive narratives, curated by local artists, not corporate firms.
- Why It Works: Topeka’s tired of being defined by Westboro’s hate or Eric Adams’ snubs. This rebrands the city as a bold, progressive hub for ideas, attracting activists, artists, and thinkers. It counters the Reddit gripes about Topeka being “dead” by creating a lively, authentic space.
- How to Fund It: Use crowdfunding campaigns led by residents, paired with grants from free speech advocacy groups like the ACLU or PEN America. Avoid Chamber-controlled funds to keep it grassroots.
- Challenge: Pushback from conservative residents who might see it as “woke.” Mitigate by emphasizing local history and inviting all voices, even dissenting ones, to the table.
- Idea: Develop a blockchain-based app (or simpler web platform) where Topekans can:
- Pitch micro-projects (e.g., a community garden, a skate park, a Black-owned coffee shop, or a solar-powered charging station).
- Buy “Topeka Tokens” (a digital or physical currency) to fund projects, with tokens redeemable at participating local businesses.
- Vote on which projects get city matching funds, ensuring democratic control over at least 10% of the city’s discretionary budget.
- Why It Works: This empowers residents, especially marginalized groups, to bypass the Chamber’s elite networks and directly shape Topeka’s future. It addresses Reddit complaints about drugs and safety by funding community spaces that foster pride and connection. It also attracts young, tech-savvy residents who want a stake in their city.
- How to Fund It: Seed the platform with a small city grant and partner with fintech startups (not the usual suspects like Evergy). Offer tax credits to local businesses that accept Topeka Tokens.
- Challenge: Digital literacy gaps could exclude older or low-income residents. Mitigate by offering in-person workshops at libraries and community centers, led by youth volunteers.
- Idea: Build a Dignity Village on city-owned land (e.g., near the Kansas River or an underused lot):
- Tiny homes (50-100 sq ft) with basic utilities, built by local trade schools like Washburn Tech to train students and cut costs.
- On-site social workers, mental health counselors, and job trainers, funded by redirecting police budget from low-level homeless-related calls.
- A resident council to set rules and manage the village, ensuring self-governance and accountability.
- Why It Works: This tackles the visible homelessness crisis head-on, countering Reddit’s safety concerns by creating a structured, supportive community. It positions Topeka as a moral leader, attracting progressive funders and volunteers. It also builds on former Mayor Michelle De La Isla’s empathy for the unhoused, who she called “my people.”
- How to Fund It: Use federal HUD grants, private donations from faith-based groups, and a “sponsor a home” campaign for residents. Repurpose underused city properties to avoid new land costs.
- Challenge: NIMBY resistance from nearby homeowners. Mitigate by hosting transparent community forums and showcasing success stories from similar models (e.g., Dignity Village in Portland, OR).
- Idea: Rotate the market across neighborhoods (NOTO, East Topeka, Holliday Park) to spread economic benefits:
- Food trucks and pop-up stalls prioritizing minority-owned businesses, with no fees for first-time vendors to lower barriers.
- Live music and DJs curated by local youth, focusing on genres like hip-hop, indie, and Latin to reflect Topeka’s diversity.
- “Maker’s Row” for artisans, tech tinkerers, and kids to sell crafts or demo projects (e.g., 3D-printed art, robotics).
- Free shuttles from low-income areas to ensure access, funded by local business sponsorships.
- Why It Works: This creates a vibrant, inclusive nightlife that doesn’t rely on alcohol or expensive venues, addressing the “nothing to do” complaint. It boosts small businesses and builds community pride, countering Topeka’s “boring” rep. It’s also mobile, avoiding the gentrification trap of fixing one area at the expense of others.
- How to Fund It: Use a mix of city arts grants, vendor fees (scaled by income), and crowdfunding. Partner with Visit Topeka for marketing but keep control local.
- Challenge: Weather and logistics could disrupt events. Mitigate by securing indoor backup venues (e.g., community centers) and investing in modular tents.
- Idea: Form a citizen-led commission with representatives from Black, Hispanic, Native American, and low-income communities:
- Hold public hearings where residents share experiences of discrimination, poverty, or police misconduct, livestreamed for transparency.
- Investigate historical injustices (e.g., redlining, displacement from urban renewal) and propose reparative policies, like community land trusts or wealth-building programs.
- Publish a report with actionable recommendations, tied to a citywide vote on adopting them, to ensure accountability.
- Why It Works: This addresses the distrust and division fueling Topeka’s stagnation, giving residents a real stake in justice. It builds on Mayor Padilla’s diversity and inclusion work but goes deeper, avoiding performative gestures. It could also attract national attention, rebranding Topeka as a leader in racial healing.
- How to Fund It: Seek grants from progressive foundations (e.g., Open Society Foundations) and redirect a small portion of the city’s DEI budget. Use volunteers to keep costs low.
- Challenge: Resistance from powerful interests who fear exposure. Mitigate by ensuring the commission is independent, with no Chamber or city official veto power.
- Idea: Launch a Rewild Topeka initiative:
- Convert vacant lots into urban prairies with native plants, maintained by youth crews trained in ecology and paid living wages.
- Create “edible forests” in food-insecure areas, planting fruit trees and herbs for free community harvesting, managed by neighborhood councils.
- Build a “River Resilience Hub” with solar-powered community spaces, flood-proof designs, and public art, doubling as an emergency shelter.
- Why It Works: This tackles environmental and social crises together, creating jobs, food security, and climate resilience. It counters Reddit’s safety concerns by beautifying neglected areas and fostering community ownership. It also attracts eco-tourists and green innovators, redefining Topeka’s image.
- How to Fund It: Tap EPA grants, partner with The Land Institute (Salina, KS) for expertise, and crowdfund via local eco-challenges (e.g., “Plant a Prairie” campaigns).
- Challenge: Lack of public buy-in for unconventional green projects. Mitigate by tying rewilding to tangible benefits (jobs, food) and showcasing quick wins, like a pilot prairie lot.
- Year 1: Kickoff and Pilots:
- Launch the Free Speech District with a high-profile debate festival, inviting national figures to draw attention.
- Pilot the Topeka Futures Market with 10 community projects, targeting diverse neighborhoods.
- Break ground on a small Dignity Village (20 homes) and one Night Market event per month.
- Form the Truth Commission with public nominations and hold first hearings.
- Start one urban prairie and edible forest as rewilding proofs-of-concept.
- Years 2-3: Scale and Refine:
- Expand the Free Speech District with permanent art and tech installations.
- Scale the Futures Market to 50 projects annually, with city matching funds doubled.
- Grow Dignity Village to 100 homes and integrate job training programs.
- Make the Night Market weekly, rotating across five neighborhoods.
- Publish the Truth Commission’s interim report and propose one major reparative policy.
- Rewild 10 vacant lots and open the River Resilience Hub.
- Years 4-7: National Model:
- Establish Topeka as a destination for free speech tourism and justice-focused conferences.
- Institutionalize the Futures Market as a core city budgeting tool, with 20% of discretionary funds community-controlled.
- Achieve zero unsheltered homelessness through Dignity Village and supportive services.
- Make the Night Market a regional draw, with satellite markets in nearby cities.
- Implement Truth Commission recommendations, like a community land trust.
- Expand rewilding to 50 lots and brand Topeka as the Rewilding Capital at national climate conferences.
- Center Residents, Not Corporations: The Futures Market and Truth Commission give power to everyday Topekans, not just business elites.
- Embrace Topeka’s Edge: The Free Speech City and Rewilding Capital lean into Topeka’s unique history and challenges, not generic “smart city” tropes.
- Solve Real Problems: Dignity Village and the Night Market directly address homelessness, safety, and boredom, which residents complain about online.
- Avoid Gentrification Traps: By spreading benefits across neighborhoods and prioritizing equity, they prevent the riverfront-style focus on one shiny area.