Topeka Should Follow Kansas City's Lead: Prioritize People, Not Parking Minimums
Kansas City just took a bold step toward smarter growth, and Topeka ought to pay attention. On Thursday, KC's City Council approved an ordinance scrapping parking minimums for new developments in much of its urban core. No longer will builders be forced to provide a set number of parking spaces that drive up costs and eat up valuable land with seas of asphalt. Instead, the focus shifts to walkability, housing, and economic opportunity—putting residents and businesses first.
Mayor Quinton Lucas put it plainly: parking minimums have made housing more expensive and hindered the creation of vibrant, connected neighborhoods. Councilmember Eric Bunch echoed that sentiment, noting how the old rules blocked redevelopment of smaller commercial buildings into restaurants and shops. This isn't radical experimentation; it's practical urban planning that recognizes cars don't need to dominate every square foot of a growing city.
Topeka faces parallel realities. Our downtown and surrounding neighborhoods have potential for more housing, small businesses, and foot traffic, yet outdated zoning often mandates excessive parking that inflates project costs and leaves underused lots. With Topeka's 2025 crime trends showing encouraging declines in both violent and property offenses compared to the five-year average, now is a smart time to build on that momentum by making our city more livable and economically dynamic.
Reducing or eliminating parking minimums in targeted areas—like downtown Topeka, the historic districts, or corridors near key amenities—could lower barriers for developers. That means more attainable housing units, which indirectly supports efforts to address homelessness (our point-in-time counts show a modest decline but persistent needs). It could also spur small business growth in older buildings that currently sit underutilized because adding mandated parking isn't feasible.
Critics in Kansas City raised fair points about neighborhoods lacking sufficient off-street options, and Topeka leaders should heed similar concerns. Any reform here shouldn't be a blanket citywide change but a thoughtful, phased approach: start with the urban core, pair it with better enforcement of illegal parking, improved public transit options (or shuttles), and incentives for shared parking or transit-oriented amenities. Neighborhood associations deserve a strong voice in the process to avoid unintended strain on residential streets.
This isn't about being anti-car—Topeka is a practical Midwestern city where driving will remain essential for many. It's about balance. Excessive parking requirements are a holdover from mid-20th-century planning that no longer fits 2026 realities of housing shortages, rising construction costs, and a desire for more vibrant public spaces.
Topeka's City Council and planning department should study KC's ordinance closely and adapt it. Hold public hearings that include developers, residents, business owners, and traffic engineers. Explore parking maximums with bonuses for pedestrian-friendly features, just as KC did. The goal: unlock redevelopment that creates jobs, adds housing supply, and makes our capital city feel more connected and welcoming.
Kansas City is betting that focusing on people, not mandated parking stalls, will yield long-term dividends in growth and quality of life. Topeka, with its own proud history and forward-looking police department already delivering crime reductions, has every reason to make a similar smart bet. Our residents deserve neighborhoods designed for living, working, and thriving—not just storing vehicles.
.jpg)