Azura Amphitheater is actually in Bonner Springs, Kansas, about 15 miles southwest of Riverside, MO.

Azura Amphitheater is an 18,000-capacity outdoor venue at 633 N 130th Street, Bonner Springs, KS, just west of Kansas City. It’s not directly managed by Live Nation but by New West Presentations, a local promoter. However, Live Nation often partners with such venues for ticketing and event promotion through Ticketmaster, which it owns. Azura hosts a variety of concerts across genres like rock, country, and pop, with a mix of reserved seating (3,100 seats) and general admission lawn space.

As of today, March 31, 2025, here’s a snapshot of Azura’s 2025 lineup:

• June 26-28: Country Stampede with Luke Bryan (Thursday), Miranda Lambert (Friday), and Cole Swindell (Saturday).
• July 13: Slightly Stoopid - Step Into The Sun Summer Tour at 7:30 PM.
• July 25: Old Dominion - How Good Is That World Tour at 7:00 PM.
• August 9: Cyndi Lauper - Girls Just Wanna Have Fun Farewell Tour at 7:00 PM.
• September 25: Three Dog Night & Little River Band at 7:30 PM.

Tickets for these events are available via Ticketmaster, tying back to Live Nation’s influence. The venue’s history goes back to 1984 when it opened as Sandstone Amphitheater, and it’s had multiple name changes (e.g., Verizon Wireless, Providence Medical Center) before Azura Credit Union took naming rights in 2021. It’s a key spot for Kansas City-area concerts, drawing big acts yearly.

If you meant the upcoming Riverside, MO, amphitheater instead, let me know—I can shift focus to that Live Nation project, still under construction as of now!

Live nation =

In Riverside, California, Live Nation operates two notable venues:

1. Riverside Municipal Auditorium
   • Located at 3485 Mission Inn Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501, this historic venue hosts a variety of concerts and events in 2025. Upcoming shows include:
     • March 29, 2025: Wild Child - A Live Doors Concert Recreation at 7:00 PM
     • April 3, 2025: Jason Joshua (R&B) at 7:00 PM
     • April 11, 2025: Losgothsco. Presents "Gothicumbia" (Dance/Electronic) at 9:00 PM
     • April 25, 2025: grentperez - Backflips in a Restaurant Tour (Pop) at 7:00 PM
     • May 9, 2025: Stan Society Presents Best Song Ever: A One Direction Dance Party at 8:30 PM
   • For more details or tickets, you can check Live Nation’s official site (livenation.com) or the venue’s site (riversiderma.com).
2. Fox Performing Arts Center
   • Located at 3801 Mission Inn Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501, this venue offers a mix of concerts, comedy, and Broadway shows. Some 2025 highlights include:
     • May 24, 2025: David Bisbal - Back In The Usa 2025
     • June 17, 2025: "Weird Al" Yankovic: Bigger & Weirder 2025 Tour
     • September 13, 2025: Benise - 25 Years of Passion!
   • More info is available at livenation.com or foxriverside.com.

`

gork = nancy

 If you're interested in tracking and potentially copying Nancy and Paul Pelosi's stock trades, several tools and websites can help you access their publicly disclosed trading activity. Here are some options based on available resources:

1. Autopilot: This app allows users to mirror the stock trades of prominent figures, including Nancy Pelosi (via her husband Paul Pelosi’s trades). It pulls data from congressional financial disclosures and executes trades automatically in your brokerage account. It’s designed for ease of use, letting you invest alongside their reported moves.
2. Capitol Trades: A free platform that tracks U.S. politician stock trades, including those of Nancy Pelosi. It compiles data from mandatory disclosures and provides details on stocks, assets, and transactions, making it a straightforward option for monitoring their activity.
3. Quiver Quantitative: This site offers detailed insights into congressional trading, including Nancy Pelosi’s portfolio. It tracks trades, estimated returns, and top holdings, calculated from disclosure filings. You can see specifics like trade volume and sectors they favor.
4. Unusual Whales: Known for its financial data tools, this platform tracks congressional trades and even powers ETFs like NANC (named after Nancy Pelosi), which follows Democratic lawmakers’ investments. It provides real-time updates and historical performance data.
5. House Stock Watcher: This site updates daily with stock trades reported by U.S. Representatives, including Nancy Pelosi. It’s a simple way to see raw disclosure data as it’s filed, though it requires more manual effort to act on the information.

A few things to keep in mind: Under the STOCK Act, congressional members must disclose trades within 45 days, so the data isn’t real-time—by the time it’s public, the market may have shifted. Paul Pelosi, a venture capitalist, handles the trading, and Nancy Pelosi has stated she doesn’t own stocks or influence these decisions. Past performance (e.g., reports of 65% returns in 2023 or over 700% in a decade) doesn’t guarantee future results, and investing carries risks, especially with options-heavy strategies like theirs.

For the most automated experience, Autopilot stands out. For free, detailed tracking, Capitol Trades or Quiver Quantitative are solid choices. Pick based on how hands-on you want to be—manual research or automatic copying. Always do your own due diligence before investing.

Disclaimer: Grok is not a financial adviser; please consult one. Don't share information that can identify you.

SCIP ( Structural Concrete Insulated Panels)

Structural Concrete Insulated Panels (SCIPs) are a type of construction technology that typically involve a core of insulating material, such as expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam, sandwiched between layers of concrete, often reinforced with steel mesh or trusses. While your question asks about a "SCIP patent," there isn’t a single definitive patent that universally defines all SCIP systems, as the technology has evolved over time with various inventors and companies contributing innovations. However, I can provide insight into one of the foundational patents related to this concept and clarify the broader context.

One of the earliest and most notable patents associated with what we now recognize as SCIP technology was issued to Victor P. Weismann in 1967. U.S. Patent No. 3,305,991, titled "Reinforced Modular Foam Panels," describes a system that aligns closely with modern SCIP designs. Filed on October 22, 1964, and granted on February 21, 1967, this patent outlines a construction panel comprising a lightweight foam core (like polystyrene) flanked by wire mesh on both sides, connected by steel trusses or ties penetrating the foam. The assembly is designed to be coated with a cementitious material, such as shotcrete, on-site to form a composite structural panel. Weismann’s invention, developed in Pasadena, California, is often cited as a pioneering step in SCIP technology, emphasizing lightweight, insulated, and strong concrete walls.

This patent’s key features include:

• Core Material: A lightweight, insulating foam (e.g., expanded polystyrene).
• Reinforcement: Galvanized wire mesh on both sides, connected by vertical steel wire trusses.
• Construction Method: The panel is finished on-site by applying concrete (via shotcreting) to both sides, creating a solid, insulated wall.

Since Weismann’s patent, numerous variations and improvements have emerged, but it laid foundational principles for SCIP systems. Other patents have built upon this concept, adapting materials, connectors, or manufacturing processes. For example:

• U.S. Patent No. 9,649,662 (issued May 16, 2017) describes a "Seamless Reinforced Concrete Structural Insulated Panel" using calcium sulfoaluminate cement and a foam core, focusing on factory precasting rather than on-site shotcreting.
• U.S. Patent No. 8,745,943 (issued June 10, 2014) covers a method for precast insulated concrete panels, including tilt-up applications, with insulation embedded during casting.

These later patents reflect refinements in the technology, but Weismann’s 1967 patent is widely recognized as an origin point for SCIP-like systems. Modern SCIP implementations, such as those by companies like Vero Building Systems or Concrewall USA, often trace their conceptual lineage back to such early innovations, though they may incorporate proprietary tweaks not fully detailed in public patents.

If you’re looking for a specific SCIP patent beyond Weismann’s, could you clarify further—perhaps a company, inventor, or feature you’re interested in? Otherwise, U.S. Patent No. 3,305,991 serves as a critical starting point for understanding the technology’s patented history.

"People v. Reynaud"

It seems like you might be referring to a legal case titled "People v. Reynaud," but there isn’t enough information in your query to pinpoint a specific case, and my search results don’t provide a clear match for a widely recognized case under that exact name. There are cases with similar names, such as "People v. Reyna" or "People v. Renaud," but "Reynaud" doesn’t directly align with a notable case from the provided context. I’ll assume you’re asking about a criminal case and provide a general response based on that, while offering to refine it if you give more details.

If you meant a specific "People v. Reynaud" case, it would typically involve the state ("People") prosecuting an individual named Reynaud for a crime. Such cases often address issues like evidence admissibility, jury instructions, or sentencing, depending on the jurisdiction and circumstances. For example, if this were a U.S. case, it could involve state-specific laws and judicial review processes, like those seen in cases such as "People v. Reyna" (Michigan, 2012), where the defendant appealed convictions for assault and firearm charges, or other similarly named cases.

Since I don’t have a definitive "People v. Reynaud" to analyze, I’ll offer a hypothetical overview: In a case like this, the prosecution might argue the defendant committed an offense (e.g., theft, assault, or a more serious crime), presenting evidence like witness testimony or physical proof. The defense could counter with challenges to evidence legality, witness credibility, or procedural errors. Appeals, if any, might focus on trial court rulings—say, a denied jury instruction or an evidentiary dispute—evaluated under standards like "abuse of discretion" or "harmless error."

If you had a particular "People v. Reynaud" in mind, please clarify the jurisdiction (e.g., state or country), year, or key details (e.g., crime type or legal issue), and I can tailor this further. Without that, I can’t confirm specifics like the outcome, legal principles, or significance. What additional information can you provide to narrow it down? 

This process works best for U.S. patents

 To research who owns a patent, follow these steps:

1. Identify the Patent Number: Start with the patent number if you have it. This is the most direct way to look up ownership. If you don’t have the number, you’ll need to search for the patent using other details like the invention title, inventor name, or keywords related to the invention.
2. Use the USPTO Patent Public Search Tool:
   • Go to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) website at uspto.gov and navigate to the "Patent Public Search" tool.
   • Enter the patent number in the search bar (e.g., "US1234567" or just "1234567" for U.S. patents).
   • Once you find the patent, look at the "Assignee" field on the patent document. This lists the entity (individual, company, or organization) to whom the patent was assigned at the time it was granted.
3. Check Patent Assignment Records:
   • Ownership can change after a patent is issued, and the original patent document might not reflect the current owner. To find the most up-to-date ownership:
     • Visit the USPTO’s "Patent Assignment Search" database (assignment.uspto.gov).
     • Search by patent number, assignee name, or other criteria.
     • Review the assignment records, which detail transfers of ownership (e.g., from the inventor to a company or between companies). These records include dates and the names of the assignor (previous owner) and assignee (new owner).
   • Note that recording assignments with the USPTO is optional, so not all transfers may be listed.
4. Explore Additional Databases:
   • Google Patents (patents.google.com): Enter the patent number or keywords. It shows basic ownership info and sometimes links to assignment data.
   • Espacenet (worldwide.espacenet.com): Useful for international patents. Search by number or keywords and check the "Applicant" or "Proprietor" field.
   • Lens.org: Another free tool that aggregates patent data globally and may provide ownership details.
5. Look for Reassignments or Changes:
   • If the patent has been sold, licensed, or transferred, the assignment records will show a "chain of title." Follow this chain to the most recent assignee.
   • Be aware that company names might change due to mergers or rebranding, so you may need to search variations of the name.
6. Contact the USPTO (if needed):
   • If online records are unclear or incomplete, you can contact the USPTO’s Assignment Recordation Branch at AssignmentCenter@uspto.gov or call 800-972-6382 for assistance.
7. Consider Legal or Professional Help:
   • For complex cases (e.g., unrecorded transfers or disputes), a patent attorney or professional searcher can dig deeper into public records or proprietary databases.

This process works best for U.S. patents. For patents in other countries, use the respective national patent office’s database (e.g., EPO for Europe, JPO for Japan) and follow a similar approach. Keep in mind that ownership info might not always be current if changes weren’t reported to the patent office.

General Concept of Redemption Rights - #mcre1

 Redemption rights refer to a property owner’s legal ability to reclaim their property after it has been subject to a tax lien or foreclosure process by paying off the delinquent taxes, interest, penalties, and associated costs. These rights are designed to give owners a final chance to avoid losing their property permanently due to unpaid taxes or assessments. Below, I’ll explain redemption rights generally and then focus on how they work in Kansas, given your earlier questions about K.S.A. 79-2801 and tax lien enforcement.

General Concept of Redemption Rights

Redemption rights arise in situations where a government or creditor enforces a lien (e.g., for unpaid property taxes). The idea is to balance the government’s need to collect revenue with fairness to property owners who might face temporary financial hardship. There are two main types:

1. Equitable Redemption
   • Occurs before a foreclosure sale.
   • The owner can pay the debt (taxes, interest, fees) to stop the foreclosure process and retain ownership.
   • This is common across most jurisdictions.
2. Statutory Redemption
   • Occurs after a foreclosure sale.
   • The owner (or sometimes junior lienholders) can reclaim the property by paying the sale price plus additional costs within a set period.
   • This is less common and depends on state law.

The specifics—timeframe, costs, and eligibility—vary by state and the type of lien being enforced.

Redemption Rights in Tax Lien Enforcement

In the context of tax liens, redemption rights typically apply to unpaid property taxes or special assessments. The process depends on whether the state uses a tax lien sale (selling the lien to an investor) or a tax foreclosure sale (selling the property itself). Kansas, as noted earlier, uses judicial tax foreclosure sales under K.S.A. 79-2801 et seq., so I’ll focus there.

Redemption Rights in Kansas

Kansas provides redemption rights primarily in the pre-sale phase (equitable redemption) during the judicial tax foreclosure process. Here’s how it works:

1. Pre-Sale Redemption Period
   • When It Starts: Once property taxes or special assessments are delinquent for at least three years after becoming eligible for a judicial tax foreclosure sale (per K.S.A. 79-2801(c)), the county (or city, if the county doesn’t act) can initiate foreclosure.
   • Duration: The redemption period lasts until the court confirms the sale after the auction. During this time—spanning from the filing of the foreclosure petition through the sale date—the owner can redeem the property.
   • What’s Required: The owner must pay:
     • All delinquent taxes (property taxes and special assessments).
     • Accrued interest (e.g., 10% or more per year under K.S.A. 79-2004a).
     • Penalties and foreclosure costs (e.g., court fees, publication costs).
   • Process: Payment is made to the county treasurer, who then notifies the court to halt the sale.
2. Post-Sale Redemption
   • Limited Availability: Kansas does not generally offer statutory redemption after the judicial tax foreclosure sale is confirmed by the court. Once the sale is finalized and a tax deed is issued to the buyer (per K.S.A. 79-2804), the original owner’s redemption rights typically expire.
   • Exception: If there’s a legal defect in the process (e.g., inadequate notice), a court might allow redemption or void the sale, but this is rare and requires legal action.
3. Notice of Redemption Rights
   • Kansas law requires notice to the owner and lienholders before the sale (K.S.A. 79-2803). This notice, often published in a newspaper and mailed, informs them of the delinquency, the pending sale, and their right to redeem by paying the full amount owed.

Who Can Redeem?

• Property Owner: The primary person with redemption rights is the titleholder.
• Lienholders: In some cases, mortgage lenders or other lienholders can redeem to protect their interest, but this is less common in Kansas tax foreclosures since the sale often extinguishes junior liens.
• Heirs or Assigns: If the owner dies or transfers rights, successors might step in.

Example in Kansas

• A property in a Kansas city has $5,000 in delinquent taxes and $2,000 in special assessments, unpaid since 2021.
• By 2025, the county files for foreclosure under K.S.A. 79-2801.
• The owner gets notice in mid-2025 that the sale is scheduled for September 2025.
• Before the sale, the owner pays $7,000 plus $1,500 in interest and fees (total $8,500) to the county treasurer.
• The foreclosure is canceled, and the owner keeps the property.
• If they don’t pay, the property is sold, and after court confirmation, redemption rights end.

Key Features of Redemption Rights

• Time-Limited: In Kansas, the window closes once the sale is finalized, emphasizing the importance of acting before the auction.
• Full Payment Required: Partial payments don’t suffice; the entire debt, including extras, must be cleared.
• Judicial Oversight: The court ensures the process is fair, but once it approves the sale, the owner’s rights are generally gone.

Comparison to Other States

• Tax Lien States (e.g., Texas): Owners might redeem after a lien sale by paying the investor, often within 6 months to 2 years.
• Statutory Redemption States (e.g., Illinois): Owners can reclaim property post-sale, sometimes up to a year, by paying the buyer’s bid plus interest.
• Kansas: Focuses on pre-sale redemption, with no standard post-sale period, aligning with its judicial foreclosure approach.

Why Redemption Rights Matter

They give owners a safety net to recover from financial setbacks without losing their property. For the government, it’s a way to encourage payment without always resorting to sales. For buyers at tax sales, it’s a risk factor—though less so in Kansas, where rights end at sale confirmation.

If you’re curious about a specific Kansas case or how this applies to a situation (e.g., city-initiated sales under K.S.A. 79-2801(c)), let me know—I can refine the explanation further!